BPCE_PILLAR_III_2017

LEGAL RISKS Legal and arbitration proceedings – Natixis

Legal and arbitration proceedings – Natixis 10.2

Like many banking groups, Natixis and its consolidated subsidiaries are involvedin litigationbefore the courts and may be investigatedby regulatory authorities. As assessed at December 31, 2017, the financial consequences of litigationdeemedlikely to have, or which have in the recent past had, a material impact on the financial situation of Natixis and/or Natixis and its consolidatedsubsidiaries as a whole, or on their profitability or their business,have been includedin Natixis’consolidatedfinancial statements. Madoff fraud Outstanding Madoff assets, net of insurance, were estimated at € 388.8 million at December 31, 2017, and were fully provisioned at this date. The effective impact of this exposure will depend on both the extent of recovery of assets invested in Natixis’ name and the outcome of the (primarily legal) measures taken by the bank. With this in mind, Natixis has appointed law firms to assist it in these recovery efforts. Furthermore, in 2011 a dispute emerged over the application of the insurance policy for professional liability in this case, which had been taken out with successive insurers for a total amount of € 123 million.In November 2016, the Paris Court of Appeal confirmed (like the Commercial Court before it) the liability of the first-line insurers, in the amounts of the policies taken out, for the losses incurred by Natixis as a result of the Madoff fraud. The implementation of this ruling by all of the insurers is ongoing. In January and February 2017, both of the first-line insurers submitted an appeal to the Court of Cassation. The hearing was held on January 31, 2018. Irving H. Picard, the court-appointedtrustee for Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC (BMIS), submitted a restitution claim concerningthe liquidationof amounts received prior to the discovery of the fraud through a complaint filed with the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York against several banking institutions, including a $400 million claim against

The most significant disputes are described below. Their inclusion in the list does not indicatethat they will necessarilyhave an impact on Natixis and/or its consolidated subsidiaries. The other disputes are deemed unlikely to have a material impact on Natixis’ financial situation or profitability and/or that of Natixis and its consolidated subsidiariesas a whole, or have not reached a stage where it can be determinedwhetherthey willhave suchan impact.

Natixis. Natixis denies the allegationsmade against it and has taken the necessary steps to defend its position and protect its rights. Natixis has launched appeals, including a motion to dismiss, requesting that the case be dismissed on a preliminarybasis or prior to any ruling on merit, and a motion to withdraw the reference to transfer certain matters to the United States district court. These proceedingshave been subject to numerous rulings and appeals and are still ongoing. A November 2016 ruling by the bankruptcy court dismissed a number of restitution claims initiated by the trustee on the groundsof extraterritoriality. The case isstill in progress. Furthermore, the trustees for the liquidation of Fairfield Sentry Limited and Fairfield Sigma Limited have initiated a large number of proceedings against investors having previously received payment from these funds for redemptions of shares (over 200 proceedings have been filed in New York). Some Natixis entities have been named as defendants in some of these proceedings. Natixis deems these proceedingsto be entirely unfounded and is vigorously defending its position. These proceedings have been suspended for several years, and in October 2016 the bankruptcycourt authorizedthe trustees to modify their initial claim. The defendants jointly responded in May and June 2017 and are awaiting the announcementof the hearing date.

Criminalcomplaints coordinated by ADAM

10

In March 2009, the Paris public prosecutor’soffice (Parquet de Paris) launcheda preliminaryinvestigationinto a complaintfiled by Natixis 2017, Natixis came under investigationfor two messages sent in the minority shareholdersand coordinatedby the Associationde Défense second half of 2007,at the beginning of the subprime crisis. proceedings,a judicial investigationopened in 2010. On February

14,

des ActionnairesMinoritaires(ADAM– Associationfor the Defenseof Minority Shareholders). As the plaintiffs have initiated civil

The judicial investigation is still being conducted.

183

Risk Report Pillar III 2017